OneStat.com Web Analytics

 
Feb
11

Ever since the news broke that the Art House residents would be evicted today, there has been little to no official comment from the City or the Treme Civic Association. That is, until now. As I mentioned before, Red Cotton brought up legitimate concerns that are being raised about the Art House by Treme residents.

-

Michele Braden, president of the Esplanade Ridge/Treme Civic Association took the time to address all the of the concerns that have been brought up about the tree house. I’ve attached the entirety of the e-mail after the jump, but for all you people with short attention spans, here are some of the highlights:

-

  • Permits, permits, permits: More specifically, the tree house’s lack there of. Braden says that she met with Paul May in the city permits’ office and was told that no permit applications were filed. This isn’t good for the tree house. Neither is this quote from Braden: “Mr. May [said] no permits had been issued and he was aware of health violations and problems with fire regulations. He also said that he had information concerning a number of people using that as a residence far in excess of what was allowed” and “They were operating illegally and with no regard for the neighbors surrounding them. The police department as well deserves some consideration.” and “All they need to do is get legal and respect their neighbors.”
  • Trash and disturbances: According to Braden, there have been many complaints about the tree house parties emitting too much noise on the weekends and the amount of trash in and around 1614 Esplanade Ave. and the neutral ground.
  • The tree house itself: Apparently neighborhood residents have been complaining about the structure itself and the state of it (not to mention the actual house the residents live in). “Complaints were also expressed about the structure which they we calling a “slide” in the side yard that was very visible from the street,” Draden said. “Esplanade Ridge has been struggling for sometime to improve the living conditions in the area.”

-

The full e-mail (sic’d) is after the jump:

-

Mr. de los Rios,

-

The property at 1614 Esplanade is zoned as residential. A group of individuals were allowed by the owner
to take it over for an art house. The property is in need of serious repair and there was a downed tree of some size in the side yard that had been ignored for some time. The first rather conspicuous violation
of the HDLC rules was the address on the building that was totally not in keeping with the scale or design
of the building.The neighborhood organization was not happy with this but felt in time they would be cited by the HDLC and be required to change it. And then the complaints started to come in concerning music being played until all hours on the weekends. Additionally there were complaints about trash on the street and in the neutral ground. Complaints were also expressed about the structure which they we calling a “slide” in the side yard that was very visible from the street.

-

After attending the NONPAC meeting at the 1st district police station which in large part opened up the
problems that they had been handling because of calls to them about noise ,I decided to visit Paul May’s
office to see what permits had been issued. According to Mr. May no permits had been issued and he was
aware of health violations and problems with fire regulations. He also said that he had information concerning a number of people using that as a residence far in excess of what was allowed. I also met with Elliot Perkins,HDLC, but he felt he was not in a position to act as yet.Mary Cunningham of Councilman James
Carter’s office was ask to coordinate the effort by Mr.May’s office. Ms. Cunningham proceeded to turn all
reports over to Eraka Williams,Asst. City Attor. I spoke with Ms. Williams who instructed me to have the
membership send all specific incidents to her office to allow her to prepare the suit against the art house.
Sir it is very hard to live in this city. Esplanade Ridge has been struggling for sometime to improve the living conditions in the area. We are trying with the help of some very courageous people to stick it out .Our new
mayor bring us great hope for serious investors.

-

They were operating illegally and with no regard for the neighbors surrounding them. The police department
as well deserves some consideration. They cannot afford to send men out over and over because of the complaints.All they need to do is get legal and respect their neighbors. I cannot take credit. I think a lot
of people were fed up!

Comments:
Bob Vila on February 11th, 2010 at 9:49 pm #

Boo Hoo! You live in the ghetto. The trash is from the crackheads at the bar across the street, which no one seems to be concerned with. If anything, the art house increases the safety of the neighborhood, so you should just deal with it!

Rebecca on February 11th, 2010 at 9:51 pm #

I don’t know about violations, noise, trash on the neutral ground or all the other complaints listed in this letter, but I do know that it’s absolutely despicable for supposedly intelligent individuals to have people evicted from their home and their electricity turned off on a night when the temperature is going into the 30’s. Can you people have some compassion for fellow human beings. The people living in this house are not bad people and never intended to hurt anyone. How could you be so inconsiderate? A resident of the art house told me last week when the Saints won the Superbowl how great it was to walk down Esplanade and have total strangers come up to him to shake hands. He said everyone was so happy and it’s too bad that life isn’t like that all the time. Well I guess this just shows what he meant because today surely proves that the kindness didn’t last very long. I hope you people feel good that you accomplished what you set out to do, putting people out of their house when they have no place else to go on a freezing cold night. I hope you all sleep well tonight in your nice warm beds.

Micah Dardar on February 11th, 2010 at 9:53 pm #

You got that right, Bob! Why doesn’t anyone bitch about the crack bar and chicken shack, or the murders that happen behind them a few blocks? I really don’t think that there is anyone that lives close enough to that house to really be bothered by the noise. Some stupid people just like to bitch. If they don’t like the city life, maybe they should trade it for the crickets in Mississippi.

Anonymous Hipster on February 11th, 2010 at 10:15 pm #

Oh, boo hoo, the underage Tulane proto-hipsters will have to go back to getting fake IDs to get into the boot.

Sorry my overprivileged ones, but you can only have illegal parties for 800 people in a house with bad wiring and no building permits for so long. Basically what you brats are saying is “So what, it’s only poor black people, why cant we descend on their neighborhood every month and cause chaos?”

M. H. on February 11th, 2010 at 10:21 pm #

As a resident of the treehouse, i would like to address a few points in Ms. Braden’s response.

Firstly, the downed tree referenced in our “side yard” is actually on a property which does Not belong to us, and is located between our very habitable home and the large, burnt-down mansion that sits opposite the school in which the Neighborhood association regularly holds its meetings. We agree that perhaps the downed tree is not the most pleasant thing to look at, but as it is not on our property, we are unable to remedy the situation.

Secondly, concerning the permits: we have sought and been issued safety and mayorality permits for our events. It is confusing to us that there appears to be no record of such at city hall; we have copies of this should anyone require it.

It is our conviction that, by creating and sharing the Treehouse, we are contributing to the culture and growth of the neighborhood that the ERTCA is attempting to protect. We are sad that, thus far, we seem to have been unable to communicate and work together with their organization, and we hope that the future holds brighter days for our collaboration.

Anonymous Hipster on February 11th, 2010 at 10:57 pm #

You have no building permits. You have no safety inspections. The building is in no way up to code. That’s why they turned the power off.

As for the parties, you have a *street team*. That’s not about art, that’s about having an illegal club in a private residence. If you wanted to keep your arts commune without playing by any building or zoning codes, you probably shouldn’t have called quite so much attention to yourselves. 800 candy-flipping undergrads puking on the neutral ground is not anything that anyone is going to tolerate, even in the “ghetto”.

Matt on February 11th, 2010 at 11:04 pm #

Permits were issued on 10/20/09 and 12/2/09 for parties:

10/20/09:
http://aca.accela.com/nola/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Permits&capID1=09SPC&capID2=00000&capID3=00186&agencyCode=NOLA
“CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR A PRIVATE HOUSE PARTY TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 30-31, 2009, AS PER SKETCH AND REVENUE CASE #2526.”

12/2/09:
http://aca.accela.com/nola/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Permits&capID1=09SPC&capID2=00000&capID3=00199&agencyCode=NOLA
“CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR A PRIVATE HOUSE PARTY TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 4-5, 2009, AS PER SKETCH AND REVENUE CASE #2815.”

Applicant on permits:
LAUREN MIEIR (listed as Lauren Miller on other permit)
1614 ESPLANADE LLC
5500 PRYTANIA ST, STE 300
NEW ORLEANS, LA, 70115

1614 Esplanade, LLC database entry:
http://coraweb.sos.louisiana.gov/commercialsearch/CommercialSearchDetails_Print.aspx?CharterID=818819

Only member on corporate database entry is John Orgon at same Prytania address as Ms. Mieir/Miller. Note that 5500 Prytania is a private mailbox firm which many companies use as their address, listing the mailbox number as a “suite.”

Mr. Orgon is involved with five other LLC’s in the city, and is listed personally as the owner on four other properties. All four of those properties have at least one - and sometimes multiple - permits taken out on them for renovations over the past three years under Mr. Orgon’s name, including mechanical and electrical work. One even lists Mr. Orgon as the contractor for a company named New Orleans Construction Services.

1614 Esplanade, LLC is the current owner, having purchased the property from Turquoise Ventures in August, 2008:

http://qpublic4.qpublic.net/la_neworleans_display.php?KEY=1614-ESPLANADEAV

Turqoise is incorrectly listed as the owner on the party permits (Safety & Permits sometimes has incorrect or out of date records).

Mr. Orgon, Ms. Mieir/Miller and the others involved appear to be quite acquainted with the procedures necessary for doing work on properties in New Orleans. They could have applied for the correct permits with the city, but did not. Now it appears their tenants are suffering for their inaction.

Matt on February 11th, 2010 at 11:13 pm #

The original article makes reference to a party held some weeks before Halloween, as well as one held on New Year’s Eve (the party attended by the author and a Gambit photographer):

“I heard about the Tree House from my friend Casey Derbes while we watched our dogs play at Coliseum Square Park last October. Sipping a beer, she spoke of a “tree house party” she had attended.”

“It’s a few hours after midnight on New Year’s Day, and I’m 45 feet in the air, standing on a satellite dish that’s been converted into a platform on the fourth story of a 50-foot-tall tree house.”
http://bestofneworleans.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A67443

The city’s permit database includes permits for an October 30-31 party and a December 4-5 party.

ME! on February 11th, 2010 at 11:19 pm #

Anonymous - It’s a private residence, as far as I know you don’t need a safety permit to build a treehouse in your backyard. It’s not a city park after all, guests enter at their own risk.

Additionally, I understand that the owners of 1614 were railroaded into buying additional insurance and made to make guests sign liability waivers.

These should be regarded as private house parties held at a private residence in the eyes of the law. For sure it is a CIVIL matter, one that should lead to a neighborhood mediator or at worst, civil court. It is definitely not a CRIMINAL matter.

No one’s electricity should be turned off. I question the legality of that. How can Entergy be ordered to shut their heat when they are a private company? What’s going on here? Everyone pays rent and utilities.

ME! on February 11th, 2010 at 11:22 pm #

Way to save documents!

ME! on February 11th, 2010 at 11:23 pm #

This is not a crime!

Anonymous Hipster on February 11th, 2010 at 11:42 pm #

Wow, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

All that those permits allow is the erection of temporary structures. Tents, stages and reviewing stands. That’s it. If you want to charge hundreds of people money to come to an event, you need about eight other permits from everyone from the fire marshall to the department of revenue.

As for the rest, yes, you need permits to erect a treehouse. These are not parties held at a private residence. They are a regular commercial operation far in excess of the fire codes, on a residential property. Finally, yes, it is a civil matter. You can tell that because no one got arrested. Turning off the power because the electrical system is a fire and safety hazard is a civil action.

ME! on February 11th, 2010 at 11:54 pm #

Explain frat houses to me then!

M. H. on February 12th, 2010 at 12:02 am #

Mr. Hipster,

I am unsure of the provenance of the linked documents provided by commentor “matt,” though I appreciate that he was able to refute the claim by Ms. Braden that no permits had been issued.

The documents which the art house received from City Hall are mayorality permits which specifically indicate that admission will be charged for the permitted event.

When we invited an officer from the City’s Safety and Permits office to come out and inspect the treehouse, he indicated that the city code has no explicit rubric that applies to the unique situation in the backyard of the ArtHouse; should you have a citation of any laws underlying your statement that one “need[s] permits to erect a treehouse,” we should be very happy to examine them.

On top of all which, we are not a commercial operation. we seek (and have heretofore been allowed to pay for) permits from the city to charge admission at semi-regular events; at all other times we are a close-knit community of artists trying to make a living in a city that we are doing our best to keep loving.

K D on February 12th, 2010 at 12:02 am #

As a proud resident of 1614 Esplanade I would like to reply:

To Anonymous Hipster….

“They are a regular commercial operation far in excess of the fire codes, on a residential property.”
- We have held in the past our one night events, with permit….definitely not what is considered a regular commercial operation. Our entertainment permits were paid for in order to charge the covers in the past…as that was what was only necessary. We never hold open club standards, but do allow for tourists and other people traveling through New Orleans to view the treehouse, NO COVER. because we are residential. Since our more recent press coverage we have had overwhelming amounts of people coming to see what else New Orleans had to offer besides booze and bars. They love it! They come and play and climb…bring their kids to go down the slide that the community organization so despises.

We buy local from our stores in the treme…we eat sleep and live our neighborhood..and the fact that they have never reached back to us, as we have requested, shows a lack of initiative on their part. We are always available and have been willing to comply to all requests…but what can you do when the other end holds off on communication?

We can only do so much to work with those who have problems with us when they will not even speak up to us. They instead go straight to the authorities.

We were never given the official report on what we needed to fix, instead we receive several NOPD, fire marshalls, and LSPCA at our doors, threatening us at our homes.

the Treehouse is an art sculpture, which no permits are required to erect, and you anonymous hipster are just nodding no at something you cannot even possibly begin to understand. I also dont appreciate you quoting my neighborhood as “ghetto” and hope that in your future debates that you practice comprehension first, and then proceed.

Thank you,
K D

Anonymous Hipster on February 12th, 2010 at 12:52 am #

It’s my neighborhood too. In fact, it was my neighborhood first. The ghetto reference was a quotation of the first reply to this blog. That is why it was in quotation marks.

As for the rest of your sanctimony, I say again, that you were issued a permit for a special event does not make your operation legal. You need more than one. Hell, just to have a tent you need two. Your “one night” events are now in the double digits. You have a street team. You publicize your events. You charge admission. They have increased in size to absurd proportions each and every month. That, by law, is a regular commercial operation.

You can pat yourselves on the back for how community positive you are and how well loved and engaged you are, but the simple fact is, you pay your rent by letting underage kids get drunk and do drugs on your premises. Given that, your claim that others should show “initiative” is laughable.

Sophie on February 12th, 2010 at 12:54 am #

The treehouse may be art, but once you allow the public to climb on it, you need building and safety permits for it. To make sure people don’t, you know, maim or kill themselves on it.

Sorry kids, but your multi-story treehouse is subject to the same restrictions as a backyard halfpipe.

Also, it’s awesomely telling, albeit nauseating and sad, that the bar across the street is, according to the Treehouse’s fans, a “crack bar.” Actually, it’s just a predominantly black bar. And, contrary to what middle-class white kids may think, not all black people smoke crack.

Anonymous Hipster on February 12th, 2010 at 1:00 am #

Oh, and Me!, Frat Houses are dormitories operated by not-for-profits as short term residences. They have a separate code section, but they still have to conform to multiple dwelling laws and have things like sprinklers and fire escapes and adequate sanitary facilities.

hunkydory on February 12th, 2010 at 1:06 am #

i think the general idea is that when you exist in a legal gray area, it’s best not to charge your guests $25 a pop and have them sign a liability waiver to hang out in your back yard and then charge them for booze at a makeshift bar… even for art’s sake

wev on February 12th, 2010 at 1:10 am #

The truly egregious thing about this is turning off the electricity and leaving these people to huddle in the cold tonight — or kicking them out onto the streets. I’m not sure where they are just now.

Was this so bad that you couldn’t put it off until morning.

I don’t care who you are — you don’t come by at sundown and turn people’s lights off. At the very least, you lose the moral high ground for it.

The Man Who Japed on February 12th, 2010 at 2:52 am #

@dory: I agree. I like what they do but the last time I was there, I remember looking around the yard area and seeing all the garbage and refuse and thinking how crazy it was that they leave all this in an area anyone can get to it. This wasn’t after an event or anything either. This is how it normally looked.

The house is also really messy as well. Now, I’m not demonizing them for how they keep their place but when cops and fire marshals show up to do on-sight inspections and see all that crap everywhere…. Well…. What did you expect them to think?

Essentially, your greed and naive attitude toward your situation got you in this mess. Did you honestly think that having a festival like that would go unnoticed by the city? Especially after that article? You must have known that the hammer would come down sooner or later.

Now, turning the electricity off and issuing illegal evictions is a low blow, I’ll give you that. But after you received the cease-and-desist order, what you should have done is let things cool down for a bit and sought out legal counsel. Then, you should have taken time to go through all the channels you needed to, to see who exactly you were pissing off. From there, you should have taken a diplomatic route and tried playing the game for a bit so you could see how that worked. But, instead you decided to poke the hive that was already buzzing with a big stick and publicly announced that you were going to do shows anyway, which, clearly provoked enough people that serious action was taken.

So, now, the situation is out of your control.

I feel for you, I really do but you brought it on yourselves.

m-dub on February 12th, 2010 at 2:55 am #

@sophie, since when does having a permit prevent people from maiming or killing themselves on it?

anyhoo, the art house got too big too fast and too publicly. When the parties first started they were more underground, and it easily could have been a very successful under the radar venture had it stayed that way.

Matt on February 12th, 2010 at 7:24 am #

This is what was planned for this weekend (no permit in city’s database):

http://risingsunfest.eventbrite.com/

“Mardi Gras in New Orleans is crazy and full of amazing things to do… and this year, we’re taking a break from that filthy Bourbon and offering the city a new spin on the season.

The three-day music fest is over Mardi Gras weekend from Saturday, February 13th to Monday, February 15th. Take a break from the French Quarter and come after the parades to vibe out in your favorite backyard.”

“We’ve got lot of your favorite local musicians, as well as artists from West to East Coast. And we’ve got genres across the board: Jazz/Blues/Soul/Funk/HipHop/Rock/Reggae/Electronic/Dance… We’ll also have food/art vendors, street performers and plenty of other surprises.

Saturday, Feb 13th - Monday, Feb 15th
Starts at 2pm each day / Two Stages
$25 DayPass / $60 Three-DayPass *

*Each DayPass is good for in/out access from 2pm - Close for that day only

Thank you, New Orleans! See you Mardi Gras weekend :)
Sincerely,
The NOLA Art House”

Bob Vila on February 12th, 2010 at 9:36 am #

Sorry, Anonymous Hipster, I didn’t realize that the new politically correct term for crackhead is “poor black people”. Awww those poor black people. Let’s feel sorry for them because they smoke crack and hate hippies.

steveeboy on February 12th, 2010 at 10:13 am #

wow, so much for that “Who Dat” unity huh?
My girl and I visited NOLA for Halloween. We dumped @1500$ into the local economy at that time. We attended the VooDoo/Halloween event at the art house after being told about it by a waiter at Pascal’s Manale. We loved the event and were planning another trip to NOLA in spring which we hoped to co-ord with another event at the art house. We thought this tree house/art house was an obvious signal of improving conditions moving up Esplanade–and we walked there in 5 minutes from our 125$/night B&B. How is it possible to claim that the tree house is “blight” when it is located right next to a loud and ugly elevated expressway and near a variety of liquor stores whose owners are all strapped with 9mm pistols and keep shot guns next to their cash registers? We live in Philly, we can tell what kind of neighborhood we are in. That tree house is benefit, not a negative. The facility should get some grant money to get up to code and the petty harassment should stop. I would think that NOLA residents would be ecstatic about any new facility that was bringing in tourist dollars and helping to attract attention to neighborhoods that could use a boost.

Sophie on February 12th, 2010 at 12:54 pm #

@m-dub: My bad. Building and safety permits and inspections decrease the possibility of someone maiming or killing themselves on a badly-built structure. You’re right; they’re not foolproof– but there’s a good reason why they exist.

Everyone I know who’s been to an Art House party has described the place as a deathtrap, not because of the treehouse itself, but because of the combination of such a structure with all the drinking and drug use.

Also, I’m curious as to the Art House people pleading poverty. They were charging $25 a head on New Year’s Eve, and they’d been selling advance tickets for their Mardi Gras festival for $25-$60; where did all that money go? Obviously not to bringing the place up to code; the T-P reports that a January 25 inspection found all sorts of code violations that still hadn’t been addressed as of yesterday.

Alejandro de los Rios on February 12th, 2010 at 1:40 pm #

One More Time: Name Calling is NOT productive. This is a passionate debate, to be sure, but no reason to start tearing each other apart. Keep it civil.

kibbles on February 12th, 2010 at 2:20 pm #

@steveeboy - as cool an idea as it is, safety & permits, fire code, and all that is a complex but important thing. trust me, i own a business and my friends have opened businesses in residential neighborhoods.

if youre too big to be underground, then you have to do it right. and that means being: A) smart. B) diplomatic.

the house was neither.

for instance: its all awesome until their overloaded electrical sparks a fire and burns the house down, destroying yet another historic, one-of-a-kind property. in new orleans, these properties come first. cuz once theyre gone, theyre *gone*. with them go the incentive for people to visit and invest here.

without our history new orleans is just another poor, run-down southern town. thus its gotta be protected, and things have to be done *right*.

make sense, kids? do what the big boys do. work with the fire department, the permitting department, your city councilman, and your neighborhood associations. be nice, play by the rules, and youll be ok.

or just stay underground next time.

The Man Who Japed on February 12th, 2010 at 4:17 pm #

@kibbles: EXACTLY!! I used to run an art gallery/event space in Chicago and I’ll tell you right now, the proper permits will be your shield against the city. Even more so if you’ve got your local politicians on your side because they’re the ones who will chime in on your behalf.

Maintaining a good rapport with your neighbors is also pretty pivotal as they’re the first ones on the food chain that’ll poke the bear, as it were. And from what I’ve read and from what I’ve heard first-hand, you’ve ignored a lot of obvious concerns like the garbage that kids who party there leave outside your house. I know you’re thinking, well, the surrounding area isn’t that great to begin with but that’s not the point. If you want the community you’re in to see you as a positive then you have to put your best foot forward. And that means getting very serious about what you’re doing.

Also, I think some of you have misunderstood what exactly a building permit is, in terms of your situation. I’m not sure about the tree-house itself but the actual house you live in, and it’s condition, also seems to be in dispute. Please keep in mind that your house in basically an antique. And the residents of this city take the condition of houses (at least the ones that aren’t completely destroyed,) very seriously. How your place looks matters. A lot. And you’re place, on the whole, looks poorly kept.

Now, if you’re a resident and you’re reading this, I want you to know that my critique of your situation really comes from a place of love. I don’t want any of you to get pushed out into the street or freeze in the dark. But, the simple truth is you went about this the wrong way. And, you know, the fact that a kid hasn’t really hurt themselves there is pure, dumb luck. Your parties have increased in scope and definitely in volume and you just don’t have the kind of man power to compensate for that. These events are too big now. Being successful is great and
I’m happy that things have worked out (up to this point,) but now you’re in a position where because of your success, you’ll have to rethink your approach entirely. And get very serious about your aspirations. And you absolutely must make peace with your neighbors.

The Man Who Japed on February 12th, 2010 at 4:29 pm #

Damn, I wish you could edit your posts. I see a number of misspellings in what I wrote. Hope it doesn’t reflect poorly on me ;)

Alejandro de los Rios on February 12th, 2010 at 4:37 pm #

I can edit my posts and I still make spelling errors. Mardi Gras kills grammar. There, I said it.

Anonymous Hipster on February 12th, 2010 at 7:23 pm #

@Bob Vila: I think all that binge drinking has affected your brain, friend. There are no hippies. If there were, crackheads wouldn’t care about them. Crackheads also don’t hang out in bars. I think we all know what word you really mean when you say “crackhead”. Perhaps you can build a treehouse for your next Klan meeting.

@steveeboy: We have a tourist economy. We love tourists. What we don’t love are pretentious name droppers who want to tell us every nickel they spent as though you were making some noble sacrifice. You went on vacation, you didn’t join the Peace Corps, and we don’t care where you ate dinner.

B.C. on February 15th, 2010 at 2:55 pm #

After seeing first hand the house, the tree house, and the stage, I would say “Its a disgrace to call yourselves a betterment to the community.” You live in a house with NO HEATSOURCE. You have unpermitted equipment everywhere, residential or not, you have permanent structures built on the property which are also not permitted. What you all did is flagrantly disregard the law. You, the residents, expect to get away with it because you are “artists”, which I do not understand. What does creating art have to do with breaking the law. Any here who wish to defend the “treehouse” should do some research and help these kids. All municipal ordinances are public record, which obviously being internet savvy as displayed by their advertisements, they could have researched themselves. Lets also not forget, they are NOT a residence, and should be considered a boarding house, which they refuse to do. Residences in N.O. are single or double family dwellings. Twelve differant individuals with multiple semi permanent visitors do not qualify. More importantly, the residents are taking up this fight, when it should be the property owner on the chopping block, he is the true culprit, not these unsuspecting kids. Also do not let them fool you, they have a disclaimer on their property stating that anyone entering does so at their own risk. Suspicious is it not? Come on, they know its dangerous, they have to be intelligent to know what they are doing is not right, do not allow the naivete get the best of you. No building permits, no mechanical permits, no electrical permits, all of this disregard is innocent? Come on, how much leeway is allowed? My opinion which is as worthless as anyone’s, get your act together do it right, abide the law, and set a better example.

Justice on February 15th, 2010 at 10:29 pm #

I had no idea there were so many bureaucracy loving folks around here! What a shame. New Orleans is the shining example that passing laws against someone’s freedoms is useless. People drink freely in the streets and everyone loves it. I don’t see what kind of harm this house is doing if people are attending these events of their own free will and paying whatever amount - that is at the discretion of the attendee. I see this whole issue as one of fear of the unknown (those psychotic drug loving artists) and jealousy of hedonistic profits, because it’s certainly offensive to make money and have fun doing it - nevermind offering the people supplying profits a wonderful time as well. Leave your cubicles behind, untie your red tape, and fucking hang yourself with it. Stop polluting civilization with your meaningless existence.

Tassie on February 16th, 2010 at 3:21 am #

Oh please. No one here loves bureaucracy. Posters here are merely trying to make the point that, like it or not, it DOES exist. Living in a Historic District adds even more layers. A three day Festival is NOT a private house party. Thumb your nose at it all you like.

B.C. on February 17th, 2010 at 11:59 am #

I just love the irony of someone who has the name “justice” posting about flagrant disregard of the law. These things exist, Jazzfest is only two three day weekends, why should they be restricted to following the law, while the “arthouse” is allowed to disregard it. And realistically, it does not come down to the parties, it comes down to the house itself. There is no heat, there is illegal fixtures, appliances, no permits, unlivable, why can people not understand this.

Gabrielle on February 18th, 2010 at 10:57 am #

Brad Pitt save us! Lets all buy properties around the art house, make them into artist lofts and buy the bar across the street and turn it into a beatnik bar. That way you can stop selling alcohol in the arthouse wich frankly is illegal since you dont have a liquer permit, sell your booze there in plastic cups so people can walk across, and make it into a block party instead of a house party. That would settle all the legal problems. And before you scream racism, Im sure you know that there are plenty of black artists in new orleans who would appreciate not only the rebirth of a run down part of town, and a low rent space filled with other artists and musicians. All proceeds from these events you hold should be going directly into improving the historical residence you live in, making improvements and art.

kibbles on February 18th, 2010 at 10:58 am #

@Justice - puleez. i AM a psychotic drug-loving artist… and i still believe in protecting historic properties #1. sorry dude this isnt indiana, our one-of-a-kind properties come first..dont like that responsibility? move to the ‘burbs.
.
its funny tho, you kids come here for college or whatnot, thinking you represent the avant garde of new orleans culture…then you grow up and move to follow your careers. meanwhile, we’re still here. so forgive me if protecting one of the things that makes this place unique offends your young sense of anti-establishment righteousness.

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 

Please note: By clicking 'submit' you are agreeing to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy