OneStat.com Web Analytics

 
Sep
29

In an interview with The Nation’s sports editor Dave Zirin, Saints linebacker Scott Fujita has taken an unusual stance for an NFL player: openly stating his support for same-sex marriage.

Zirin’s story, “Can the NFL Tackle Homophobia?,” includes quotes from a Huffington Post essay by Baltimore Ravens linebacker Brendon Ayanbadejo, who wrote:

If Britney Spears can party it up in Vegas with one of her boys and go get married on a whim and annul her marriage the next day, why can’t a loving same sex couple tie the knot … But now here in 2009 same sex marriages are prohibited. I think we will look back in 10, 20, 30 years and be amazed that gays and lesbians did not have the same rights as every one else.

Fujita agrees:

I hope he’s right in his prediction, and I hope even more that it doesn’t take that long. People could look at this issue without blinders on…the blinders imposed by their church, their parents, their friends or, in our case, their coaches and locker rooms. I wish they would realize that it’s not a religion issue. It’s not a government issue. It’s not even a gay/straight issue or a question of your manhood. It’s a human issue. And until more people see that, we’re stuck arguing with people who don’t have an argument.

Fujita has spoken out on other social topics before, including Japanese-American interment during World War II (his grandmother, Lillie Fujita, was forced to relocate to a government camp in Arizona in the 1940s). In a 2006 interview with ESPN.com, Fujita said, “Any prejudice has to be unacceptable.”

Zirin reports that Fujita has endorsed the Oct. 11 National Equality March in Washington, D.C., and concludes, “When athletes like Fujita and Ayanbadejo speak out against homophobia, they are not only challenging the status quo but redefining a warped vision of manhood in the process.”


Comments:
Jeff on September 29th, 2009 at 6:06 pm #

Dude just went up 10 points in my book! This even tops his tackle against the Eagles in 2006. What a stud.

Chad Seeger on September 29th, 2009 at 6:52 pm #

This is exactly what I’d expect from a Cal grad. Way to go Scott!

Big Red on September 29th, 2009 at 10:17 pm #

mad love and props to you Scott. You didn’t have to say anything on this front but you did. You’re a big man and a Saint.

CONSUELO on September 30th, 2009 at 10:14 am #

GAYS AND LESBIANS HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS OTHERS, AS THEY ARE, EACH MALE AND OTHERS FEMALE, ARE MEN AND WOMANS IS AND ARE GUARANTEED
THEIR RIGHTS, WHAT THEY HAVE IN THEIR MIND IS ANOTHER THING WHICH PERHAPS DESERVES REGULATED.

jack on September 30th, 2009 at 5:50 pm #

hey consuelo, perhaps you didn’t realize that in parts of the USA as recently as 40 years ago YOU would not have been permitted to marry a person of non ;atin european descent. back then it was a sin to mingle races by marriages.

UAFA on September 30th, 2009 at 10:56 pm #

@ CONSUELO. There are at least +1100 federal marriage rights that gays and lesbians are not afforded. If you use the rights talking points that everyone can marry, but they just have to marry someone of the opposite sex then let my ask you this, CAN I MARRY YOUR DAUGHTER?

Man-E-Faces on October 1st, 2009 at 9:56 am #

“You can paint it any color, so long as it’s black.” The thing is, most people today equate marriage as being based in romantic love. So if you’re only attracted to your own gender, you simply do not have equal access to civil marriage. “You can have a sham marriage” is not much of an answer. It is simply unconstitutional and, too often, suggests imposition of religion which is also unconstitutional.

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 

Please note: By clicking 'submit' you are agreeing to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy