OneStat.com Web Analytics

 
May
08

This is just bizarre. Dan Baum, who moved to the Marigny after the storm and wrote the online New Orleans Journal for The New Yorker until the magazine didn’t renew his contract, this afternoon the story of his firing … on Twitter, in 140-character chunks.

Baum, who came through town a couple of months ago on a tour for his book Nine Lives (Gambit review here) and managed to put his foot in his mouth in the process, was always, to me, an incredible bundle of contradictions — a brilliant writer and unabashed fan of New Orleans who, still, never quite got over seeing the city through the eyes of a charmingly bedazzled and sometimes gaffe-prone tourist. (See foot-in-mouth link above.) But none of this explains why a guy would feel the need to relate the story of losing his job, two years after the fact, and use the staccato text-message format to do it.

You’ll have to read from the bottom up to get the story (and the surreal effect):

Loved it. More later.

It gets away with it, because writing for the New Yorker is the ne plus ultra of journalism gigs. Like everybody, I

Just the way the New Yorker chooses to behave. It shows no loyalty to its writers, yet expects full fealty in return.

Year. Every September, I was up for review. Turns out, all New Yorker writers work this way, even the bigfeet. It’s

My gig was a straight dollars-for-words arrangement: 30,000 words a year for $90,000. And the contract was year-to-

But rather a contractor. So there’s no health insurance, no 401K, and most of all, no guarantee of a job beyond one year.

First, a little about the job of New Yorker staff writer. “Staff writer” is a bit of a misnomer, as you’re not an employee,

Character chunks.

Nobody leaves a New Yorker job voluntarily. I was fired. And over the next few days, I’ll tell that story here, in 140

People often ask why I left the New Yorker. After all, I had a staff writer job. Isn’t that the best job in journalism? Yes.

It’s hard not to feel empathy for the man, even as he comes off as tone-deaf to the way other writers (and people) live, complaining about a gig that paid him $90,000 a year for 30,000 words; that’s nearly six figures for around 1,700 words a week. But despite that salary, he apparently felt ill-served by the famously imperious magazine: “Every September, I was up for review. Turns out, all New Yorker writers work this way, even the bigfeet. It’s / Just the way the New Yorker chooses to behave. It shows no loyalty to its writers, yet expects full fealty in return. / It gets away with it, because writing for the New Yorker is the ne plus ultra of journalism gigs.”

Telling the story of losing your job in 140-character posts on Twitter is a whole lot of things, none of which seems like a remotely good idea for a teenager fired from a fast-food gig, much less a national magazine correspondent. Baum mentions several times last week when he lost track of the days, showing up for appointments one day early or late, not being able to sleep, and this meticulous, microscopic story of losing a job he loved seems the work of a man under a tremendous amount of pressure, using the Internet as a therapist. And though I don’t know Dan Baum, I hope he’s OK.


Comments:
jeffrey on May 8th, 2009 at 10:17 pm #

It’s actually not a bad gimmick. Have you heard of anyone deliberately using Twitter in this way before?

Now your point about blowing out your personal garbage in a particularly attention-grabbing fashion on the internet certainly still stands. But if we ignore the content, it’s actually not a bad piece of performance art.

nancy on May 8th, 2009 at 10:55 pm #

Baum essentially says, over on Bloggasm, that yes, he’s thinking it might sell some books:
http://bloggasm.com/former-new-yorker-staff-writer-tweets-the-story-of-his-firing-from-the-magazine

liprap on May 8th, 2009 at 11:08 pm #

1. Reading a story like that through a backlog of Tweets gives me a freaking headache, though I love one Tweeter Tuber’s take on it:

http://twitter.com/FutureBoy/status/1743495299
http://twitter.com/FutureBoy/status/1743500545

“If you haven’t already, check out @danielsbaum ’s giant fail: ‘Why the New Yorker Fired Me’ in tweet-sized chunks. Reading it, I think that/the no. 1 rule of Twitter should be “Tweets = complete sentences.”

Nice INcomplete way of putting it.

2. Bless you, Kevin, for pinpointing why I’ve felt so uneasy about this guy ever since his comments on Marketplace about New Orleanians not wanting good government. It’s all just bizarre, and it makes the Michael Finkel move seem quite sane and balanced by comparison:

http://www.slate.com/id/2171305/

Dan Baum on May 8th, 2009 at 11:08 pm #

Thank you for your concern, Kevin. I’m fine. (Though I’ll cop to feeling pressure; it’s a hard time for our business.
Tweeting this story about my time at the New Yorker is a strange exercise, I’ll grant you that. And to be perfectly honest, I didn’t realize the size of the tiger whose tail I was grabbing. I had 25 followers at lunchtime today and watching the number soar is a bit unnerving.
It’s a gimmick, yes, and I hope it sells books, sure. But it’s also galled me a bit, as a reporter, that the New Yorker pulls a veil of secrecy over itself to rival the NSA. I mean, it’s a very good magazine, but it’s just a magazine. And as I travel to talk about “Nine Lives,” people express a lot of interest in it. “How does it work over there?” “How do you break in?” “What’s the editing process like?” “Why’d you get fired?” The New Yorker is a national institution, and I have a journalist’s natural urge to inform the public about it.
Without giving too much away, my getting fired was in very large part my own fault, so it’s not a full-on dish by an aggrieved victim. And I hope people will see that I have a lot of good things to say about the place.
Thank you for paying attention.
Dan

termite on May 10th, 2009 at 3:12 pm #

the twittersphere is what you make it, it can be personal or very vanilla.
sometimes i’m amazed by what i read but for the most part, it’s just mindless fun.

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 

Please note: By clicking 'submit' you are agreeing to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy