OneStat.com Web Analytics

 
Oct
11

Contrary to what many expected (and some still believe), voters in the Second Congressional District Democratic primary did not cast their ballots strictly along racial lines on Oct. 4. In fact, nearly two-thirds of the white vote went to black candidates rather than to the sole white contender, former TV newscaster Helena Moreno.

 

Among black voters, almost half supported incumbent Congressman Bill Jefferson, with a slim majority — about 54 percent — voting for his challengers.

 

Those observations are important because many voters in the district now view the Nov. 4 runoff through New Orleans’ traditional racial prism: Jefferson is black; Moreno is white; the district’s electorate is 62 percent black; therefore, Jefferson wins.

 

Indeed, if the vote breaks along racial lines, Moreno is toast. But, if she can convince at least 17 percent of the district’s black voters to support her, she has a chance. Given Jefferson’s 16-count federal indictment for bribery, racketeering and more, she feels she has standing to seek support in all corners of the district.

 

But first, she will have to break through that old racial prism.

 

Within days of the Oct. 4 primary, I started hearing a familiar refrain from local black politicos: Why should blacks support Moreno? Y’all put us in this spot because y’all all voted for her.

 

Wrong.

 

Let’s do the math, because the numbers cannot be disputed:

   • Jefferson led the field with 25 percent of the overall vote.

   • Moreno finished second with just under 20 percent of the overall vote.

   • Of the voters who actually cast ballots in the Second District on Oct. 4, roughly 51.5 percent were African-American and 48.5 were white or other. That’s the conclusion of Greg Rigamer, a demographer who has tracked voter turnout for years. Post-Katrina population loss was greatest among the city’s black voters, and it shows in the turnout figures. Black turnout will be higher on Nov. 4, however, with Sen. Barack Obama on the ballot for president.

 

Rigamer also examined returns from precincts that are overwhelmingly white or black to determine how much “crossover” votes Jefferson and Moreno got. He found that Jefferson got roughly 4 percent of the white vote, while Moreno got about 5 percent of the black vote. Knowing that Jefferson got 25 percent and Moreno got roughly 20 percent of the overall vote, that means Jefferson got about 46 percent of the black vote — while Moreno got only about 34 percent of the white vote.

 

That means well over 60 percent of the district’s white voters supported one of Jefferson’s African-American challengers.

 

So how did we end up with Moreno and Jefferson in the runoff?

 

Not because whites supported Moreno, but rather because so many credible black candidates — five in all — challenged Jefferson. In doing so, they split up the anti-Jefferson vote so much that Jefferson was able to run first, and Moreno second, even though neither frontrunner captured a majority of the black or white vote. Between them, Jefferson and Moreno got only 45 percent of the overall vote.

 

Had only one or two black candidates opposed Jefferson, it’s extremely likely that the runoff picture today would look radically different.

 

Veteran political consultant Bill Rouselle reminded The Times-Picayune’s Stephanie Grace that years ago local black political organizations would have gotten together to agree on one major challenger. I recall a time when New Orleans had a real leader for a black mayor, a guy named Dutch Morial. Had Dutch been in office this past July, you can bet he would have made sure that only one major black challenger rose to the occasion — and he would have made sure that candidate had plenty of resources.

 

It’s a different story today.

 

The bottom line for black politicos and black voters is this: If you want to vote against Moreno because she’s white, just say so. But don’t blame this runoff on white voters, because nearly two out of three white voters in that district tried to put a black candidate in the runoff against Dollar Bill. At the same time, nearly half the district’s black voters opted to send him back to Washington.

 

The numbers don’t lie.


Comments:
Adrastos on October 11th, 2008 at 1:27 am #

I’m abstaining. I dislike the incumbent and I don’t vote for candidates who I think are ninnies.

Just posted my electoral vote estimate. Maybe we need a local pundit pool.

Clancy DuBos on October 11th, 2008 at 1:49 am #

A local pundit pool is a great idea on the Prez race. Let’s each put up $5 and winner takes everyone out for a beer.

John on October 11th, 2008 at 7:22 am #

I recall no time in New Orleans political history since Ernest Morial was mayor that we were offered only one choice in Black candidates because the Black Political machines were as amiable as Mr. Rouselle claims. I also find it strange that anyone would consider that a good thing if it were true. Four years ago the machines may well have gotten behind Senator Sheppard when he ran against Jefferson and we would have elected another crook as a result of their collective wisdom.

Also, while it is obvious that whites will support black candidates in New Orleans the fact that Ms. Moreno may have approached the 4 or 5% level by a speculative cross-over analysis, it is hardly proof of the Black populations willingness to support a white candidate over any Black option.

Red on October 11th, 2008 at 11:14 am #

thanks for this analysis Clancy. VERY informative and well done.

Cliff on October 11th, 2008 at 9:33 pm #

I think Moreno could do it if she ignores tradition and engages black voters. Enough black voters don’t want to vote for Jefferson for her to win but they won’t do it unless she shows them the proper respect and not assume that they will just vote for the black candidate. That’s why white candidates have a problem winning. Blacks have no problem voting for a capable white candidate. We are very familiar with a white person being in charge. We just don’t want to be taken advantage of if we can prevent it. When neither candidate distinguishes themselves we go with the black candidate as the lesser of the possible evils. If she can show she’s going up there to represent the entire district and not just a few selected neighborhoods she can win this thing hands down.

Adrastos on October 11th, 2008 at 10:06 pm #

The problem with Moreno, Cliff is that she’s not very capable. Initially I was intrigued but gave up on her after seeing her campaign in person.

John on October 12th, 2008 at 8:09 am #

Cliff, how does a White candidate engage and show the proper respect to Black candidates? This could be useful information as I think many candidates have no idea how to do this.

I agree, paying Black ministers and Black political organizations for endorsements and providing walking around money on election day for voter turn-out efforts is hardly admirable, but what is to be done?

John on October 12th, 2008 at 8:52 am #

Sorry:

Cliff, how does a White candidate engage and show the proper respect to Black VOTERS?

Cliff on October 12th, 2008 at 10:56 am #

John,
They go to where they live and treat them like intelligent people who are concerned about issues. There are lots of them. Forget those commercials with black preachers and other people who address everything along racial lines. All commercial ads like that are dismissive of my intelligence. Whoever the candidate is that finally breaks through has to know that after years of living in this area and being programmed to think racially about everything the first few efforts to do this may not work but they have to keep the discussion open. When the people see they are sincere they will listen.

Now, it might be late in the game for Moreno and then there’s the whole Barack Obama thing but we have a mayor’s race soon and we need the best candidate to win. If that person happens to be white, they need to open up that dialogue now and break down the racial lines. The black candidates should do the same thing with white voters. I’m going to play the poor man’s political pundit and say look out for Jim Bernazzani. I’m not sure if he plans on running for mayor or not but I heard him on the radio last week and he’s not afraid to talk directly to black people.

Kevin Allman on October 12th, 2008 at 7:18 pm #

Cliff wrote:

“Now, it might be late in the game for Moreno and then there’s the whole Barack Obama thing but we have a mayor’s race soon and we need the best candidate to win. If that person happens to be white, they need to open up that dialogue now and break down the racial lines. The black candidates should do the same thing with white voters.”

Martin O’Malley, who is white, got elected in Baltimore by using just that strategy.

Actually talking to people and trying to understand their concerns - what a concept. So crazy it just might work.

Clancy DuBos on October 12th, 2008 at 8:10 pm #

Cliff, I could not agree with you more (as usual!). In my own dealings with residents of the Lower 9 through Holy Cross School’s redevelopment, I learned first-hand how important it is to engage people where they live and on their own terms. Political candidates need to learn that and practice it. Don’t know if Helena has the time or inclination to do that at this late hour…but it will be an interesting race to watch in any event.

As for Jim Bernazzani, he is ineligible to run for mayor. He will not have lived in N.O. for the Charter-required five years before the next mayoral term begins; he therefore cannot run. He is constructively engaged, however, with his new charity, the Youth Rescue Initiative. (The YRI’s web site is still “young,” but here’s the link: http://youthrescueinitiative.org/more/index.php)

Take care and thanks for responding.

LegalBlonde on October 13th, 2008 at 9:20 am #

Clancy - First, congratulations to you and your wife for the award from the Anti-Defamation League!

Here is my question: I understand what you are saying about this not being a racial issue based on polling numbers. However, don’t you think the majority of people who DID vote for Moreno, did so because she was white - not because she was qualified? Further, it does become a racial issue now in the runoff almost for the same reasons?

I agree, there has to be engagement in all communities to win. I think there will be protest votes - a lot of whites abstained from voting against Karen Carter when she ran against Jefferson. Moreno may have won the battle, but how can win the war?

LegalBlonde on October 14th, 2008 at 10:28 pm #

I think these numbers are the city wide numbers from DA’s race. If you crunch the numbers you will see that for the closed democratic primary the turn out was 60/40 black/white… It is impossible for the city to be 50% white democrat and 50% black democrat.

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 

Please note: By clicking 'submit' you are agreeing to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy