OneStat.com Web Analytics

 
Aug
24

(This post is actually by Michael Tisserand, former Gambit Weekly editor and participant in Saturday’s (8/23) Rising Tide III conference, which was excellent. Michael and his family have recently returned to New Orleans, and I know of his strong interest in public education, so I asked him to submit something to our blog about the education panel discussion at RT3. Here it is — and thanks, Michael.)

 

Paul Tough’s recent New York Times Magazine cover story extolling the New Orleans charter school movement didn’t have many fans on the Rising Tide III education panel on Saturday. “Garbage,” said Christian Roselund, a writer, former United Teachers of New Orleans communications director and (of course) a blogger. Around him, heads nodded in agreement.

 

In one corner: Paul Tough. In the other: Rising Tide. The panel tilted against the charters as sharply as Tough’s article tilted for them. The Center for Community Change’s Leigh Dingerson (author of the provocative report Dismantling a Community) charged that conservatives saw a chance to turn a major public institution into a market-based system, that the glowing reports of the new set-up are more PR- than data-driven, and that the cost of this movement is too high: “What New Orleans lost was the permission to make your own decisions.” Panelists knocked all the big players as co-conspirators: the Cowen Institute, New Schools for New Orleans, and the Greater New Orleans Education Foundation. Last year, I wrote an article for The Nation that was considered a skeptical take on the new charter system, but the lack of divergent viewpoints on the Rising Tide panel started to get stifling. Where were the voices for charters?

 

Then panelist (and, of course, blogger) Clifton Harris spoke up. A New Orleans public school graduate with teachers in the family, he is no charter cheerleader. He spoke of trying to find a good kindergarten for his kid, and learning that of the “five to ten schools that you feel pretty good about … most have waiting lists. After that it becomes a guessing game.” But in spite of this uncertainty — and regardless of ideology — the New Orleanians he knows haven’t forgotten the bad old days and are ready to try just about anything new. “For the last 40 years, public schools failed us badly. We carry that with us.” Harris drew the loudest applause of the afternoon.


Comments:
John on August 24th, 2008 at 12:49 pm #

“Where were the voices for charters?”

Perhaps leading productive lives rather than attending a conference of ‘community activists” interested on recreating the status quo anti.

em on August 24th, 2008 at 12:57 pm #

Charters were certainly unrepresented on the panel but there were some of us in the audience. Taking it all with a grain of salt. Lots of good information and discussion, despite the complete anti-charter bias.

YatPundit on August 24th, 2008 at 1:22 pm #

Perhaps leading productive lives rather than attending a conference of ‘community activists” interested on recreating the status quo anti.

that’s a bit of a cheap shot in terms of the productive lives comment, but anyone formerly affiliated with UTNO has to be viewed with skepticism. The teachers union was a part of the original problem, pre-storm.

liprap on August 24th, 2008 at 2:05 pm #

“The teachers union was a part of the original problem, pre-storm.”

Cliff made that point as well, YP. It’s one of the reasons why he was on the panel.

huckupchuck on August 24th, 2008 at 3:54 pm #

I was in the audience at RTIII. I am a native New Orleanean and a parent of two kids in one of New Orleans well-regarded public (now charter) school (Lusher). My oldest started out at another charter, the ISL (International School of Louisiana) before Katrina hit, but we moved her to Lusher after the storm due to uncertainty surrounding ISL’s future. I agree with Michael and em in noting the absence of any alternative voices on the panel. I don’t think this was intentional, though. I just think it reflected who the panel organizer knew and could line up to participate. And I agree with Yatpundit that John’s comment was a cheap shot that does nothing but validate the points the panelists were making about the perception of a dismissive privatization of public education. I hold a different opinion on charters and I understand them the way Cliff does. But I also support them because I see value in charters in rebuilding communities, just not in the old-fashioned way of thinking of community that the activist panelists represented. I’m going to write more on this on my own blog soon, and I’m sure it will receive mixed reaction from the progressive NOLA blogosphere, but parents who want something better from public schools for their children than what New Orleans offered previously is not something that deserves the kind of patronizing dismissiveness of charter public schools that tended to come across on the panel.

John on August 24th, 2008 at 5:31 pm #

I am impressed, you have it just right and I’m a reactionary in favor of a dismissive privatization of public education and the progressive panel has a patronizing dismissiveness of charter public schools.

I look forward to reading more on this soon on your own blog, I’m sure pubic education will be advanced.

gregp on August 24th, 2008 at 5:55 pm #

“John” is a troll, and should be treated accordingly.

Kevin Allman on August 24th, 2008 at 10:32 pm #

John is welcome, though I’m not big on snark in place of discussion. But I don’t have a dog in this fight (or a kid in this school system), so school me on charter education and I’ll read it.

Tom on August 25th, 2008 at 5:49 pm #

“liberals need not abdicate their place on the educational cutting edge, and ought not be seen as defenders of bureaucracy and failure.” Indeed, among the most vocal champions of New Orleans charters have been the city’s most prominent Democrats.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070910/tisserand/3

Michael Tisserand on August 25th, 2008 at 10:26 pm #

I noticed in a few places that people interpreted my post to mean that the panelists were too harsh on charter schools. Not so. I appreciated hearing what the panelists had to say, and I think their arguments — especially about the community vs. consumer model of public education — are important ones. (I especially recommend panelist Leigh Dingerson’s work — it’s challenging and substantive.) My main point was that I prefer panels that include more divergent points of view, and I wish there were had been some pro-charter folks there to get into a healthy debate. But maybe I was just grumpy because Rising Tide was out of XL T-shirts. I’ll just have to get there earlier next year.

liprap on August 27th, 2008 at 10:14 am #

Michael, as an RT organizer, I can say that we will be getting some more XL shirts made up and one will be sent to you ASAP. We grossly underestimated the demand this year. Ugh.

Thanks again for your comments!

Thanks

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 

Please note: By clicking 'submit' you are agreeing to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy