OneStat.com Web Analytics

 
Jul
24

Whether you like the group or not, you can’t say the Alliance for Good Government chose a bad handle. Truth is, many members of the group play politics almost as hardball as anybody else in town. But with a name like THE ALLIANCE FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT, well, it’s got that Good Housekeeping thing going for it.

 

Which is why candidates spend days — even weeks — working the Alliance membership in advance of the organization’s public forums, which always precede the group’s closed-door endorsement caucuses.

 

In the Second Congressional District Democratic primary, state Rep. Cedric Richmond of eastern New Orleans landed the Alliance endorsement last night (Wednesday, July 23). It’s a coup for Richmond (oops! That’s another organization…and it might not even exist ay more, but that’s another story), who I figured would face some stiff competition from City Councilman James Carter of Algiers, who has been touted as a reformer by some Uptown types lately.

 

In a crowded field such as this one, and on a low-turnout day (which is what everyone’s expecting for the Sept. 6 primary), the Alliance endorsement could prove more significant than usual.


Comments:
Marilyn Landiak on July 26th, 2008 at 6:28 pm #

Did the Alliance for Good Government not know about Cedric Richmond’s suspension from the practice of law on April 4, 2008 for “unremorseful” lying under oath about numerous things at his trial for disqualification of his city council candidacy in 2005, or did they simply not care?
In its report, the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board found that Richmond knowingly made false sworn statements in the public record, refused to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his conduct, “had a dishonest or selfish motive” for his actions, and “repeatedly tried to shift the blame to others”.
Four members of the Board opined that Richmond’s conduct in the disciplinary proceedings has brought into question his integrity and fitness to practice law.
Furthermore, records submitted in evidence at Richmond’s trial showed that he continued to claim a Louisiana Homestead Exemption on 4809 Eastview Drive through the end of 2004, although he testified at trial that the property was always a rental property and that he never actually lived there.
Is this the type of person that the Alliance chooses to endorse? Is this the type of person that we want to have representing us in the United States Congress? Surely we can do better than this.
The complete opinion is available at www.labd.org, for anyone who would like to read it.

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 

Please note: By clicking 'submit' you are agreeing to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy