OneStat.com Web Analytics

 
Jul
24

One of my favorite local bloggers is Clifton over at Cliff’s Crib; he makes me think, makes me laugh, and writes like a plainspoken dream. Today he brings up a good point about all the TV, blog, and newspaper swarmcoverage of the NOAH brouhaha. Says Cliff:

I am not a fan of Ray Nagin’s management style. I would have liked him to be more aggressive early in the recovery. I thought he was taking a business approach when the citizens needed some inspiration. Even today I have problems with many of the decisions of his administration. You can read archives of this page and see that I have been fussing about Mayor Nagin since I started blogging. While I may not be pleased with his performance as mayor, I never try to turn this man into a crook just because I am mad. There seems to be this obsession with turning this man into a criminal mastermind. Why can’t he just be a bad mayor and nothing more? 

If I may paraphrase, Cliff seems to be saying: Don’t necessarily ascribe to malice what might actually be incompetence. Further, he adds:

People hate this man so much that Jim Letten would have indicted him a long time ago if he had something. If I am proved wrong and Ray turns out to be like Bill Jefferson then I will admit it. I just can’t see Mayor Nagin doing anything that foolish with every investigative reporter in the city going through his trash. 

Read the whole thing. What do you think? Does Cliff have, as we say around here, a pernt?


Comments:
Maitri on July 24th, 2008 at 2:22 pm #

Have you heard what comes out of Nagin’s mouth? We don’t consider him a criminal mastermind, just one who constantly makes excuses for mistakes and hinders this recovery. The lack of transparency is far worse than a crime.

bayoustjohndavid on July 26th, 2008 at 1:50 am #

I’m so sick of that line of reasoning about Jim Letten. Nagin’s been in office for six years, how long did it take to indict Jefferson or anybody connected to Mor ial? Also, any investigation of the Nagin administration would involve an investigation into Katrina reconstruction contracts, think maybe the Bush Justice Department would be reluctant to open that can of worms?

I thought Nagin was merely incompetent and indifferent until his re-election campaign. Once Nagin told us to ask ourselves why people were giving money to his opponent, I looked at who was giving money to Nagin and wrote:

“it seems like the mayor takes a fair amount of money from businesses (including out of state businesses) that either do business with the city, or may seek to do business with the city. Hard to tell very much from a list of individual campaign donors, but I was shocked to see CH2MHILL, that CH2MHILL, among the mayor’s donors. Considering the city’s abandoned car and general garbage disposal situation and the mayor’s insinuations about taking donations from individuals who might want to profit from the city, it seems like the mayor gets a lot of Benjamins from companies in the disposal, scrap metal or landfill business.”

The contracts to cronies and campaign donors is reason one to dismiss Hanlon’s razor.

Reason two would be the lack of transparency that Maitri cites. By itself, it wouldn’t be proof of criminality, but secrecy where public money is involved and national security is not an excuse, should always be a red flag.

Thirdly, there’s the absurd lack of spending priorities from a mayor who promised to “stretch every dollar” to make the recovery work. We always hear staff shortages as an excuse for poor services or failure to communicate, but we find money for new garbage and Disneyland garbage collection, complete with a tactical trash force. Could a businessman’s, could anybody’s, spending priorities be that out of whack?

I think that Occam’s razor would lead us to throw away Hanlon’s razor where Nagin’s concerned.

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 

Please note: By clicking 'submit' you are agreeing to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy