OneStat.com Web Analytics

 
Feb
25

By Jeremy Alford 

In one of the legislative session’s more comical moments, Rep. Karen Carter Peterson, a New Orleans Democrat, wondered aloud if she would have to divorce her husband, a well-known political consultant, because an administration-backed bill would prohibit lawmakers from paying family members from their campaign accounts. “I wouldn’t want him running my campaign anyway,” she joked. “You can’t be campaigning on the streets and then go home together. That would be madness.” In jest, the bill’s author, GOP House Speaker Jim Tucker of Terrytown, suggested Peterson could “pay” her husband “in-kind,” a remark that a blushing Peterson quickly countered by saying, “That would go well beyond the contribution limits.” Her husband, Dana Peterson, has managed several high-profile Democratic campaigns, including Lt. Gov. Mitch Landrieu’s unsuccessful bid for mayor. 


Comments:
Ann Marie on February 25th, 2008 at 5:18 pm #

I think it is interesting how people can now publically jest about divorce, especially politicians. This just shows how much more divorce has changed in the past 5 years than in the last 20. Divorce was so taboo it was not even talked about and here, now a politician can publically jest about divorcing her husband. I know this may seem very small and insiginificant but I work for www.firstwivesworld.com. It is an online community for women navigating through the various stages of divorce and life thereafter. Our goal is to remove the stigma from divorce and unite the some 40 million divorced women out there. With our country advancing as it is that stigma should soon be completely gone.
Just my two cents
Ann Marie

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 

Please note: By clicking 'submit' you are agreeing to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy